About Me

Name: JONALIST
Location: Prattville, AL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Economical Fallacy in 2010 & Beyond

See This Economical Fallacy

Have you read the article: "Obama: Here's $5,000. Go hire someone" , January 29, 2010: 2:02 PM ET, written By Catherine Clifford, CNN staff reporter.

$5,000 tax credit for each net new employees that a firm hires this year. Start-ups launched in 2010 would be eligible for half of the tax credit (this one feature of 'Job Credit Proposal' proves the Fallacy to help the American Economy). Firms could earn the credit by raising wages or increasing the hours of their current workers, as well as by hiring new employees. The tax credit would be adjusted for inflation, and would not apply to wage increases above the current taxable maximum of $106,800. Businesses that cut 20 workers and hire five wouldn't be eligible, nor would those that lay off a $50,000 worker and hire two $20,000 staffers.



Obama hopes tax credits will motivate small companies to hire,
but business owners like, Jimmie Hughes says the approach is
backward: to hire, Hughes needs sales and cash, not tax cuts.

Examining This Tax Credit-Cash Flow Fallacy

Ironic that Obama and his Advisers cannot see the forest for the trees. To start-up a business in Alabama Law that removes auto parts from vehicles has to have a Surety Bond of $100,000 plus prepay the State Revenue Tax and Fees so if you hired 20 people you would break even of part of that financial profiteering scheme and it is like that in all states. The Obama Administration is not proving anything to me by doing this excepting that it will create a chaotic state of jobs available for a short time span and those will eventually end prior to or following the next year. Hiring fewer people does not get you any benefit at all while at a cost $33 billion, according to White House, seems a splendid waste of taxpayer money that will never recover of the cost of $33 billion. Capped at a total of $500,000 per firm shows that only 100 people (maximum) at most would be a potential and anything over shows no resolution of so called benefit. What makes it even more provoked is that to claim the credits on a quarterly basis dribbles out the resultant benefit that does not last the entire year at tax time of the employed business.

How Many Would Be Necessary To Hire Nationwide In A Conversion Objective To Convert Consumer Cars? More Than 100 per State! I Say This Deal Is a Farce & a High-Risk Gamble That Will Not Work Economically, a Economical Fallacy!

The Foundation is a private non-government ideology that speaks for the Consumer Interest and the well bein of the nation.

What Is To Many Government Jobs

If our government were to have a payroll of 2.125 million employees, would that be to many on payroll? In 2010, Obama is attempting to have that many employees, what is it going to be in 2011, 2012, 2013, how about 2025, or 2050? Can we afford this including their retirement and pension program? Remember government employees do not pay taxes, their is not money accumulated from their employment that is part of the share all other taxpayers pay into since their income is from the treasury. Just what is to many employees? Do you begin to see the curve downward in having money to pay all that overhead? To many is to much so something has to give along the way either taxpayers have to pay more or there has to be cuts in the government budget so why not start cutting the budget right now since this is the best time to see this downward curve?

What is $1.6 Trillion per year times four years mean to 2.125 million government employees that do not pay tax and will have a pension from retirement and Taxpayer will not even have a 401K or other retirement without it being taxed for their Health Care? If anyone elects Obama again write a book about the missing $12.8 Trillion that vanished in eight years to credit card companies.

My Project Plan is to do just that & it does not require banking, or monthly payments from Consumer's, it does not even rely upon Taxpayer Money. My Plan creates manufacturing that would make the components for Conversion & those would be distributed to Conversion Facilities, there would be no monetary exchange for that & this is not a Sales Operation so theres no Catalog which Consumer's would look at to Order something from not even if they wanted to do it themselves cause they would not be allowed for safety reasons. My Project could clog up every HWY & Interstate in every state without the authorization of 'Service When Available' because as many auto owners as there are everyone of them would want their auto converted for free. All that I ask would be a simple yearly Warranty Fee more likely $1,500 & that requires a vehicle check-up by participating Consumer's. It Is the only plan that government could rely upon to manage to change from the ironic deal Unions Authorized for America in importing Oil to make Gasoline/Diesel, to dispose of the necessity of ICE autos entirely. I would have hoped for a better job but this is all I could think about & I have been publishing this for over a year now. I can't get donations to get it started, it also requires to much Business License Fees - $100,000 Surety Bond per Business plus Attorney Fees & prepaid Taxes just to establish the Conversion Facilities in every State, that is well over 5,000 Employees/State. It would be the biggest New Industrial Era Job Opportunity The World Has Ever Seen & profits from removed parts the main concern for export to nations that need those parts. I need backers & as many volunteers as possible, we need servers. I figure President Obama has more Taxpayer Money on his mind and for that reason will not wander into my ideological territory, or perhaps those Czars that are concerned about labor and jobs want to keep the momentum strength in the Oil Revenues and Automakers Union Leadership to control Dealerships and laws pertaining to ICE autos and trucks. I was not ever for the termination of automakers or their Union Jobs, there's ways they can work with The Foundation which would benefit them and not have as many loses as the Czars maybe hacking behind our back about. Personally it is the Right of The Consumer not The Right of a President to make a decision on their property and how they wish to manage their property. This is the point I was stressing about 'The Power of Attorney' when I stated that Obama was heading to steal that from everyone using the powers vested in The Health Care Bill, and it is still a possibility. If it is going to cost you your 401K each year in payments because of your medical bills then you need something better than what Government could provide you. I would welcome suggestions as to how to create a Health Care Trust which would interact with The Foundation to serve those whom participate at no cost. My initial plan looks at a hospital as a business just like a Restaurant which has unannounced inspections during the week and receives a rating, its your money your paying to hospitals and doctors so do what you want to do, I just believe in a efficient operation not some location that sends out for things needed for your medical problem as they decide when they want to which means a day or two later it arrives in stock at the hospital of doctors office and Medicare or Medicaid is billed for the days in the hospital of your stay and it is all about cleanliness of the facilities. If these factors were taken into consideration by inspectors maybe the State could crack down on bad practices faster and that is what I believe. Sure, sometimes when you need more than the 'Power of Attorney' you might find you don't have that much available through a Government backed solution because they are controlling not only you but everyone that associates with you while in a hospital.


Additional Economical Woes Affecting America

Perhaps your not aware that the onset of this Jobs objective there was a tremendous showing for Caterpillar, that is about to go bust as China now looks at Caterpillar as a potential buy and to top that has terminated 25,000 more jobs (James W. Owens, the chairman of Caterpillar Inc., which announced last week the layoff of 20,000 jobs back in late January 2010, furthermore: Peoria, Ill.-based Caterpillar also reported Monday that its fourth-quarter profit plunged 32 percent. The company expects sharply lower results this year as global economic problems cut into its business.)  This could only mean one thing, Islamic Investors within China (in Xinjiang esp.) wish to make their future debut in a caterpillar job opportunity in China since the Curbs were Imposed on Muslims in government jobs back in 2008. Does this begin to make sense when Jobs have become the backbone for export, worries that China will curb bank lending because of stock failures certainly isn't making any new relations better? It is speaking a riddle we shouldn't invest into just like The Hummer. China has also denounced U.S. trade ruling on steel pipe import tariff taxation another taxpayer money profiteering adding. The blow we were not expecting was that "China pulls financial plug on Western debt [http://www.thecomingdepression.net/countries/eurasia/china-finally-begins-financial-plug-on-western-debt/]". America has become debt ridden, China has become skeptic that America can pay the debt, the former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson remarked that Russia gave the incentive for China to dump 2008 bonds of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so that Russia and the Chinese “that together they might sell big chunks of their GSE holdings to force the U.S. to use its emergency authorities to prop up these companies,” Is there anything obvious about owning chunks of America's Debt Ridden Assets to push export assets to save jobs such as Caterpillar Inc.

There could be another spin to Jobs in America which I devoted time to despite my recent operations I am currently recovering from. My objective does allow export for Trade purposes but the State Laws are so strict on profiteering from business it is hardly worth building a big business, I am going towards this in a different way which is a better position as a Foundation and it is not creating a commercial business entity which sells its products on open market or in a catalog but uses its products itself in supporting consumer needs and this eliminates banking from the economical picture and saves trillions of dollars and so much time that it is more objective than awaiting the next phase of new vehicles to come off a assembly line. Where we went wrong is allowing Obama to shovel down our mouths his objective of profiteering using Taxpayer Money so now we are still in the same sinking ship and still no Foundation can startup. What we must do is to get the attention of all Obama Advisers that the future must change for the scope of consumer appreciation, America is going down the tube otherwise. There's more bias to Obama than this profiting monetary issue.

EVFCF Is My Economic Solution

Dreaming economic solutions that Uncle Sam has not fathomed to deal with job creation has aimed at the Unionized solvency, no need of Federal Bureau intervention, its the way in which consumer's are being told they have to do with what government established and nothing that a Foundation can establish came forth which can also yield job creation. Taking a look at the banking services, a Foundation could accomplish what is necessary by eliminating the bank concept, consumer's are given what they need and that is warranted each year to bring down their overhead and to offer a new broad wave of trade with other nations, that would be the Federal service job which secures that foreign trade and the loophole for The Foundation to get out of the brokerage job motivation. If the Foundation is not burdened with foreign financials the work of The Foundation would smooth out for all the states to head towards a non-foreign oil independent solution becoming the first nation to back consumer's conversion of their vehicles. There lies the answer to jobs and the economy at the top of the failure that automakers created autos that do not have conversion products. The Foundation takes a consumer's auto and converts it using the products The Foundation has created not a commercial operation and fully warranted and tested each year, this is the answer we must consider. The Obama Administration is lacking surety, the issue that prevents the Foundation to establish because according to state laws a business must have a surety bond costing $100,000 for this type of service work - removing parts from a automobile, thus being licensed for conversion products is the next financial business expense but a Foundation is not a business (it should not be taxed, it should not have to have surety bonding) is not capable of securing a business loan from community banking which caters to consumer needs. The Foundation is not willing to sell components on market nor to allow consumer's to convert their own vehicle which is a chaotic situation and wishes to maintain a uniformity for all consumer's therefore the production of products would be aimed at serving whichever sized auto consumer's have already purchased and owned. This eliminates the need of consumer's to purchase new automobiles and downplays the need of community banking to support consumer needs for loans to pay for their transportation. In a nut shell our economy would be enriched through the reclaim of products from each consumer vehicle as sold to foreign countries that need these products for their own consumer needs, esp. Haiti which needs auto parts. Internal Combustion Engines (ICE) is what the Foundation would be collectively accumulating in all states, if the trade issue did not produce buyers then the product would become a issue to recycle adding to the enrichment of materials for new products to be manufactured, that is a lot of cast iron, aluminum, magnesium, plastic, and glass materials. If a deal were worked out with automakers for consumer's to purchase a new auto body then The Foundation's manufacture of electronic components for those autos would encourage a equal solution amongst all automakers without buying into ICE components. I have studied the United States situation, I know the world's need of materials procurement is increasing but their economy is also failing. We must judge others as they judge us, yields to the concept that they to could create a Foundation that could remanage their economy. That is the objective, is it not the answer as well? China is being unfairly judged of its materials that are now seen as a import tax profit by administrators and China is furious that such import taxation is affecting their economy.

Obama's main selfish reasoning in Job Creation started with "WE DO NOT QUIT", what does that say for handicaps that should not be seen as Quitters. Obama addresses the whole of America and they are left out else Obama is a hypocrite and thinks they should be left out. I am sorry to see that Obama so selfish that he wastes taxpayer money on such statements that do not reflect their pain and anguish, did he think they are quitters? Wise up Presidents do not squander taxpayer money for political purposes as he has. I would never quit no matter if the pain got so great I could not walk, but I can say this much about myself - "I DID NOT QUIT AS HE'S INSINUATING & I WOULD NOT GIVE HIM THE PLEASURES OF BEING A QUITTER". So get this much straight, AMERICA was not a job for me to fix up just so that he could squander innovation for the purpose of obtaining a profit from the use of Taxpayer Money as he has done so, America was important to me because people like him torment others and take unfair advantage of their offers and I might add he's not the only personal argument that I could make regarding how our nation must serve along side other nations that are doing exactly the same thing he has done. It makes me angry that Obama, has not given MY PROJECT PLAN any servitude and it makes me angry to see, Biden, by his side pushing him through his temperaments as I saw in his speech of the State of the Union 2010. All I was asking was for was to give the consumer's a chance, it is their tax money they must depend on for this nation to have what this nation needs, we do not need foreign expenditures taking that away from taxpayers. We do not need a Progressive movement that is ignorant of the better method: http://evfcf.mysite.com/index.html - so Haiti and a Horse Breeder Haitian Heart felt opportunity to bring the simplest transport to the island would be better than nothing. Job Creation is a truth we should depend on The Foundation to bring Job's that affect consumer's need for Electric Automobiles therefore we need to make a effort to create the manufacturing facility for The Foundation and its workers can decide whether they would like to create a more perfect Union that allows them to work for the Foundation instead of their normal job through The Foundation thereby creating less need of Federal Jobs. My concept for the United States Transportation Department outweighs the neglect Obama has given towards My Project Plan. Obama neglected My Project Plan from Day One and continues to do so, it is about time he stops doing that and we get on with creating Jobs In America.

TEN REASONS FOR ETHICALLY UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM:
Thus Far Our Fundamental Understanding Of What Banking Was Responsible For Has Been Wrong.
.
(1) COSTS OVERRUN IS THE OUTSTANDING MOST EVIDENT FUNDING PROBLEM. BEING AHEAD OF THE GAME IS IMPORTANT.
(2) EXTENSIVE EXPENDITURES ON EVENTS AND SPECIAL PROPOSALS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR ADDS UNREASONIBLY TO COSTS.
(3) EXPANSION ESP. OF SINGLE UNIT ATM SERVICES INFLATES THE ENTIRE SPECTRUM OF BANKING IN GENERAL, MUCH LESS ACCOMPLISHED DUE TO CONTRACTUALS.
(4) OTHER CONSOLIDATED BANKS OF THE CORPORATE NEEDING SPECIAL ATTENTION OVER LOSSES.
(5) FAILURES OF SERVICES TO TEND TO EVERYDAY NECESSITIES FORCING BACKLOGS TO BECOME SCRUNCHED LACKING MANY DETAILS.
(6) GOVERNMENT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE BANK FOR ITS OWN PURPOSE IN SERVING CERTAIN CUSTOMERS NOT IN THE AGENDA.
(7) STOCK INFRACTIONS THAT AIM TO DISCREDIT CUSTOMERS CREDIT.
(8) LACK OF PROVISIONS FOR FUNDING CUSTOMER REQUESTS FORCING CUSTOMERS TO WITHDRAW.
(9) CUSTOMER DISSATISFACTION OF SERVICES OR ANGRY AT BANKING STAFF MEMBERS ATTITUDE.
(10) DEVELOPERS PUSHING THROUGH A GAPPING HOLE IN A ECONOMICALLY STALLED CONSUMER PLATFORM.

If you are going to complain that you have a Lemon which you would rather not have someone Convert to Electric for you maybe you have a good argument and could manage to get a dealer in your area to help you obtain a newer model auto body which you would rather have Converted, The Foundation would be able to support that but your responsible to the dealer for another auto body. For this reason I felt it necessary that automakers should help The Foundation make this possible and the Unions back the decision.

LINKS:

The Electric Vehicle Free Conversion Foundation (EVFCF)

How our government could remanage itself...
United States Department Of Electric Vehicles (DOEV)

ENERGY CLUB SAVINGS PLAN ... Employee Opportunity
Establishing A Health Care Trust Fund: (1) | (2) | (3)

Windows Live Spaces: 1 | 2 | 3 and these MySite | MySpace | Twitter | Blogger

My Townhall Blog - America Is Great So Are The People

Health Care You Missed Never Has Gone To Record

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Friday, December 18, 2009
12:20:08 PM

I wrote the initial Plan to create a alternative way that American's could insure their own self which Government has never considered and it involves Banks, Banking Principles, and you the Taxpayer. This Plan is entitled "New Policy Service" and I conceived it on one of  Ann Coulter's, Columnist for Townhall, Townhall Columns entitled "Less Health Care for More Money", written Wednesday, December 16, 2009. All postings by me are entitled, "Other Than Insurance What Could Be It". President Obama, was so certain our Government was out of options and was heading into a complete failure because everyone according to him had to have Insurance Coverage to fix the issues which Insurers inpose on their Insured through their Policies, I knew of a better option and have always held to a principle that I could solve problems in a more adequate way than our Government. I cannot say this is producing any good whatsoever, our Government is Bias, Opinionated, Greedy, Un-founding New Principles, and Insecure at its present state of organization.

I am, Jonalist, the author of "The Electric Vehicle Free Conversion Foundation (EVFCF)".
I am also a member of "The Picken's Plan".

--------<<<>>>--------

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It

Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 8
Date: Dec 17, 2009 - 4:38 PM EST
All Insurance does is to establish that a individual is capable to pay, this Health Care Bill establishes a prepaid commitment by everyone and has a possibility to increase premiums regardless of what they are insured for plus to give all insured the option to pay a $750 Tax to avoid buying into the Program each year so that eventually when a insured individual does desire Insurance he/she can then buy into the program twelve years later. This would be cheaper for everyone to do but it is GREEDY just as Karl Rove has stated on FoxNews. Insurers would still be paying elaborate Advertising Overheads, Employee Bonuses, and avoiding a Premium increase after purchase however the government could increase the Tax if you do not purchase into the Program. There's no Insurance Co created so it is only a Program it's nothing more.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 17, 2009 - 5:13 PM EST
What other good, Insurance Co's accomplish is to borrow from Banks (this can lower rates but not when Insurers don't pay back on time causing more borrowing by Banks) on a scale that complies to the customers need and the customer database will increase because of the demand to Have insurance. Doctors & Hospitals borrow more.

Serving as a example to our U.S. Constitution shouldn't we post a Common Health Care Law to give the meaning in this state of Individual Insurance. This should be on display in every Bank in America. This prevents advertising expenses for each individual. The By Laws explain fully what the Right are for Account Depositor. Listen, the FDIC insures bank accounts up to $250,000, it is out of funds, why then do they not allow you to insure your money & yourself at the same time, instead of having Insurance Co's so to eliminate Bank Loans to Insurers.

NOT A - Second Bill of Rights.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 3
Date: Dec 17, 2009 - 6:41 PM EST
Currently Health Care Insurance is a way to build a New Banking Consortium & it is in Command of the Cash Flow which leans towards advertising of David Axelrod businesses. Insurers would have to borrow money from banks still and the insured that do business with them instead would be paying more for the buck they obtain from banks so the interest is doubled by insurers for all their customers while on the side some insurers offer banking and loans as well for big business and customer's too. This can build bigger pharmacy's with greater insurer overheads to pay them if they get the loan from them. Medicare then having been cut $500 million will eventually show decreases in individual acceptance of Medicare and the law Social Security had established becomes a un-necessary waste expenditure to qualify for Medicare requiring work credits to do so. This would generate savings for the Health Care Program that don't have to deal with Medicare individuals so pharmaceuticals will be decreased in cost to attempt to get back losses. Doctors & Hospitals still end up having to borrow more banker money to even if their patient database increases.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 1:56 AM EST
Given a opportunity to write a new policy, but not to allow Bankers to create a option for all the people, We Should Write It Our Self that Banks have to Endorse or We Should Terminate the Bank. Writing in a Administrator to serve as our Bank Officer (Local-Non-Federal-Appointment) & the principles that We Write for the Administrator Duty for each Bank to endorse. This can start the New Service. It is not a Bankers responsibility to solve a issue that the Government has initialized, nor did the people initialize the issues which came out of the Democratic Party selective President's mind based on a non-selected voters Democratic Candidate's Platform. This is one segment of the Democratic Party attempting to Command & Control the other segment of the Democratic Party at the Taxpayers Expense. If the minority Democratic Party Members cannot overthrow this attempt then they are victim of a scandal that will pull down the entire Democratic Party as a whole and involve every Taxpayer in the meantime committing Taxpayers to the agenda if it is Health Care or other legislative issue. It is a Bankers responsibility to comply to the provisions the Administrator is observing to handle each individual. When Banks are not open 24/7 We Need to launch a New Office to work with the Banks.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 2:54 AM EST
If you want to expose the Government's Health Care Operation then point out that it is not featured as a 24/7 operation, holidays there is no Health care and that means that anyone whom has to pay for not having it could forget to consider that because there would be no Government Office Open on that Holiday to pay whatever they wish if it is $750 or other amount for other scenarios.

On the other hand, oppose it because your disgusted that No One in Congress knows what it is.

On second thought, oppose it because your Writing a New Policy Service which needs the endorsement of Congress so Congress needs to stop what they are doing to consider your consideration instead.

Also, remember your not being paid to compose a New Policy Service, Congress & Obama get paid whether what they do is right or wrong so oppose that too.

As a New Policy Service for all the people consider Earning Interest on Your Money First and then Write. We Need A Maximum Ceiling to what We Invest, Our Shares in our self can not be sold to others or sold as a grouping for others to Administer, We are responsible for our New Policy Service and its Shares. The ceiling needs to be at 500,000 Shares per individual, however a Share costs 50 cents and becomes valued eventually at $1.00. A Bill owed to a Hospital or a Doctor or for Pharmaceuticals is paid via Shares that become loans for Hospitals, Doctors, & Pharmacies and are discounted with bonus amounts that are not taxed, the greater the loan the bigger the tax relief. Now our New Policy Service will work for everyone.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 3:17 AM EST
This illustrates the New Policy Service and it is not a Insurance and it does not need money from the Taxpayers Caufer and Taxpayer Caufers in the future is not depending on repayment to Government. The major importance here is that the New Policy Service can also work with your existing Insurance Plan and you could also have another Insurance Plan anytime. Why is it that Obama has set a DOoMsDay on American's Options to Congress to Pass His Health Care Bill - He Is A Greedy Man. With this New Policy Service did you see where I wrote in a necessity that all the population has to do this, did I say they have to pay $750 if they do not, are they going to see this as a benefit rather than their money in a dead place not working as money should to keep the economy functional, well, I do believe in this and will commit it to a website. I want everyone to consider this and to stop Congress however you can because if i get backers it will put Obama's guarantee in the trash and our Government cannot compete with this New Policy Service. You cannot argue against it because it works for You, it will also work for for Hospitals, Doctors, Pharmaceuticals, Pharmacies, and is a Non-Advertising Plan, and is not burdened by Board Members with Bonus Payments each year, nor will it Tax anyone. It is not a Savings Plan but it is Your High Risk New Policy Service - once a member always a member and You cannot withdraw, all you can do is Earn-Earn-Earn Quarterly Interest. Kiss Obama Goodbye Folks, THIS IS IT!
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 4:33 AM EST
The major reason that you should oppose Obamacare and any other Health Care Insurance right now that Government is pounding to pass against the wishes of the population is that in what Government is doing - IT IS A VIOLATION OF YOUR "RIGHT TO" USE YOUR "POWER OF ATTORNEY". For this oversight, Government Officials should be expelled as members of Congress and or impeached immediately. There is no logical reason that your rights should be violated. Remember this United States Government belongs To The People For Which It Stands. Obama cannot change that aspect of Government making our nation a pawn of other nations financial authorities, if he continues to do this - HE IS IMPEACHABLE.
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 11:40 AM EST
Without the "Power of Attorney" in all nations a American Bank would be the only recourse a American Citizen would have in complying to any format of Government Health Care Insurance, this does not limit Banks to expand their operations in other nations and does not hamper American's whom would wish to be covered under the New Policy Service Plan that goes with them everywhere. In working with another nations Government Banking becomes a priority for all American's working or visiting that nation, it does not put any burden on another nations Hospitals or Doctors. I would stop the Government in their Health Care Plan as it is written right now if I could, I suggest you to support this New Policy Service as a alternative to Health Care Insurance proposed by our Government. If you value your "Rights" as a U.S. Citizen you know you need your "Power of Attorney" everywhere you travel, take this as a warning else Government will control every aspect of your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness everywhere you travel having command over your "Power of Attorney", do not allow Government to steal from you what you need most. Stop Senator Harry Reid of Nevada (D-NV) from alienating you abroad right now, impose impeachment if necessary. Kiss Obama Goodbye Folks, THIS IS IT!
======================

Other Than Insurance What Could Be It
Charles
Location: AL
Reply # 1
Date: Dec 18, 2009 - 11:59 AM EST
You want 'Universal Health Care' in all languages, then you will have to tell Government it has limited aspects that you are more familiar with such as particular languages that you have known and use. If you become unstablized as a result of the Government Health Care Insurance you will find it is because of not supporting a  'Universal Health Care' Plan that is knowledgeable in all languages, how else can you be certain that your coverage would protect you if there was any small infraction that prevents Hospitals, Doctors, Pharmacies, & Pharmaceutical's from knowing what they are dealing with when your in need when they speak a entirely different language & do not follow the laws of the American Government esp. the U.S. Code and that makes this the second most important issue you have to deal with else when you elect a Administrator of the New Policy Service to guide other nations your speaking the tone they would like to hear and they benefit as much as you would. I'll sale this as a burdenless opportunity for all American's everywhere to all Banks, We Do Not Have To Have A Insurer Whom's Greed Depends On The U.S. Government, We Need Our Resources Our Entire Lifetime. Why is it that our FDIC can insure a Bank superficially for each deposit up to $250,000 right now without having to place $250,000 into each bank for each account to be insured? I am telling you the secret that our Federal Reserve wishes to keep you from realizing because when you realize the Banks do not get deposits to insure each account they tender immediately you then realize that We Could Do The Same thing in Insuring Our Self. So, I Impeach President Barack Obama this Friday in the month of December and Day of the Eighteenth in the Year of our Lord Two-Thousand and Nine. Kiss Obama Goodbye Folks, THIS IS IT!
======================

My Blog Website is accessable at http://evfcf.mysite.com/ & http://www.evfcf.mysite.com/
You may contact me at jonalist@evfcf.mysite.com


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care You Missed Never Has Gone To Record

Isn't Obama carrying this a bit to far and Pelosi egging the crowd? It is not the fault of the attendees of Town Hall Meetings and others whom are not insured. The government faces them as if they must comply to a illness which is a vital to the budget process. That is wrong politics, the budget must first comply to be able and I do not see that it is and to charge this expense of law making to the people at large is absurd so Pelosi is wearing her thinking cap on sideways keeping a single eye towards Obama making claims that people are Communist and hecklers are Nazi's and no one is sane anymore. This is a phase of child behavior we learned to ignore as children reach shelves for candy on the way out of the grocery store we tell them NO. What happened to the already Health Care Plans, isn't states suppose to legislate Medicaid offices and prevail in the matters from the State Health Department instead of creating Federal Offices to manage the State Health Departments and calling that Reform for Health Care. I have you know I went through the system, I earned privileges which were adequate to cover my medical episodes and have done well over the years. Recent medical problems were detected via a MRI scan something I had never experienced and now our government wants to take that away from doctors that use those images to determine the problem, well that is a shame cause I will live a bit longer because of a MRI that detected slipping discs and will soon have surgery to remove a single disc of the many that are encroaching my spine which tends to the nerves in my lungs at C5-6 and C6-7. I think it a sham that our government would stand up and tell those they expect to pay for Health Care that they are going to have to live without doctors that need MRI scans and that includes the Ultra-Sound scans which did detect a hernia I had and it was tended to immediately without having to return home once the doctor that ordered a Ultra-Scan on my belly to determine that problem at my belly button. You actually want me to believe in a government? You want my vote issue after issue? You want me to go to all the Town Hall Meetings and appear as a Hologram then I will appear as a Hologram, and if Obama wants to fight it out he will have to do this after my upcoming surgery else I would have to do it from the hospital premise either before I go under or after I awaken. I would like to remind you, States must comply to making it possible for Medicaid supporting doctors to participate with State Medicaid and the Medicaid Programs including Flu Shots and other can be administered appropriately at the State Health Clinics for free. I would like to advise Obama that he has a right to withdraw his claim to support the people of America and step down before we fight it out because I shall prove to everyone he has gone to far and enlisted a poor advisor named Nancy Pelosi whom has stocks still in Iranian Fiber Optics and we know how valuable Fiber Optics are to hospitals and nuclear facilities of North Korea don't we. Please make certain Obama has seen this so he can respond cause his Czars at the White House are blocking my e-mails to him and he should have responded already. I am the author of "The Electric Vehicle Free Conversion Foundation (EVFCF)" and my latest News Response Page where you can find some images I cropped of my MRI's that show where the Obama 'Fable' ends in the death of the taxpayers that cannot get diagnosed from a simple MRI. Be reasonable Obama before you get your feet stuffed into your mouth.
 
So What your telling me is that Obama don't really care these uninsured people are evident to the world, that violates their privacy that they are now exposed as would be soon their Social Security Numbers. What matters is that they are lied to by government administrators that have salaries and insurance, these people called uninsured should not exist they should have Medicaid Coverage, why not Obama. Every State should comply to Medicaid, its not feasible that Medicare be used as a tool to guide people into a work environment for business supported insurance plans which are not going to fulfill their work credits for full coverage and that will drop them out of the Generic Drug Category which is all there is remaining if MRI's and Ultra-Scan is going to be terminated from insurance coverage like in the case of Medicaid patient coverage. At least if a individual does not have enough work credits he or she can qualify for Medicaid and then they have the Generic Drug coverage and MRI and Ultra-Scan capability but its not something that Obama should overlook, by no means he should be telling everyone to head to Social Security to sign up for Medicaid if they do not have work credits for Medicare coverage. It is nothing strange that our government does not know itself what a individual should do, its just stupid that they don't tell everyone how to do it. It is illegal that individuals should pay more and receive anything less. It is illegal to treat Health Care as if it needed a bailout cause of a increase in the population when it (MEDICAID) is not supported in all states making all doctors eligible to participate in the Medicaid Program. If they come from a state that does not support Medicaid they cannot participate, what good is their Doctor on Call Program - can't they just stay at home and say well, if I had Medicaid coverage in my state I might be able to help those in other states but if I go to other states all I can do is earn some tax credits and come back home not having been able to tend to patients all I actually accomplished is sending them to some other doctor in the Medicaid Program and I can do that for thirteen doctors per year per patient so I can still participate. That is the loop-hole, that is the wasteful expenditure, that is Obama's trickery to allow this to continue and states to fail to endorse stopping wasteful spending. Obama are you ready to fight, when I win you have to step down as President of The United States of America. This is my call, your doomed Obama. After your term expires you shall never ever be elected to tend to American's needs again as a political individual set to cripple the Democrats. I am not claiming a political assertion but I will say that Republicans can be more knowledgeable than Democrats and show more intelligence to not be so ignorant to the needs of Americans. Surtax for workers Health Care Policies is out of the world illegal, suppose they are now going to be paying the fine print additional surcharges AT&T and Cable Television Companies are working to preserve and charge them so that is double taxation and illegal entirely in a free government. If you do not believe this then you must really read that fine print, those companies can add as much surtax to your bill as they please without any state legislation because the Feds have given them an endorsement and that was the pre-fix to this reformation proposal for a new law.
 
Charles Jones - The Jonalist
Monday, August 10, 2009 7:46:04 PM
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »